Drawing from my math classes, higher dimensions did not
exist in the essence of space, but rather were used to represent abstract
concepts that could not be simply represented in. From Henderson’s article, you
can see that artists did essentially the opposite of this, rather than assigning
dimensions to different elements in mathematic problem solving, they assigned
different elements to further expand their artwork.
![]() |
| An inverted chess board, using perspective and different aspects of mathematics |
In ways, the applications
are parallel, where time can be a variable in equations, while in art, time can
add the fourth dimension in terms of motion. In addition, mathematics adds to
perspective in art, allowing for different tools to be used in terms of
pyramids and such to recreate the notion of distance in their artwork and create
a sense of realism, as if the viewer was that far away from the subject of the artwork.
![]() |
| A picture of the houses in flatland, and some of characters, serving as commentary on society |
![]() |
| Mapping of facial patterns in accordance with the golden ratio |
One example of artwork using mathematics is the Marquardt beauty
mask in which mathematics is used to define what different cultures defines as
beauty, embodying the notion that phi or the golden ratio is present in everyday
natural beauty. Mathematics can then extend to not only the creation of art,
but can be used as a tool to define different aspects of beauty, which defines new
constructions of beauty.
The juxtaposition of math, art, and science ends up showing
how similar all these separate cultures are. Overall, one realizes that math
and science are just different ways of using representative tools to define
different laws about the world, while art in a similar fashion uses these tools
to define what beauty may be, and can even be used towards commentary about how
things are.
Sources:
FLATLAND: A Romance of Many Dimensions - E. Abbott. ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Abbott/paper.pdf.
Online, UC.
“Mathematics-pt1-ZeroPerspectiveGoldenMean.mov.” YouTube, YouTube, 9 Apr. 2012,
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMmq5B1LKDg.
Henderson, Linda Dalrymple. “The Fourth Dimension and Non-Euclidean Geometry in Modern Art: Conclusion.” Leonardo, vol. 17, no. 3, 1984, pp. 205–210. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/1575193.
Meisner, Gary, et al. “Beauty in the Human Face and the Golden Ratio.” The Golden Ratio: Phi, 1.618, 5 July 2018, www.goldennumber.net/beauty/.
The Mathematics of Art - Math Central, mathcentral.uregina.ca/beyond/articles/Art/art1.html.



No comments:
Post a Comment